Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

Studolymp / IMC / 2026

IMC 2026
contestants 447 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest
#teamnbestscoreaveragemedianFSTHMleague
1MIPT 1792326.4848061··First Prize
2Saint-Petersburg State University88928874.764.562··First Prize
3Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn78328675.358511·First Prize
4Belarusian State University 1471277.369.7694···First Prize
5Leiden University374273.368.3693···First Prize
6Ecole Polytechnique582269.468.75941··First Prize
7Math&Maroc586266.269.351212·Second Prize
8India479265676131··First Prize
9Jagiellonian University674260.367.75433··First Prize
10Ivan the Confessor's Team of Teamless Students14880258772513101951First Prize
11MIPT 2770249.764.356331·First Prize
12Higher School of Economics1171248.56557632·First Prize
13National team of Turkmenistan56624762.35841··First Prize
14ITMO University566244.862.36032··First Prize
15Lomonosov Moscow State University775229.661431321Second Prize
16NUPBrains56122958.35323··Second Prize
17Charles University46722857.75313··Second Prize
18University of Warsaw475222.557.348.512·1Second Prize
19Yerevan State University366218.754.756111·Third Prize
20State Energy Institute of Turkmenistan461218.355.352.522··Second Prize
21Novosibirsk State University567215.6564913·1Second Prize
22ETH Zurich1259214.958.3433314First Prize
23University of Ljubljana859212.35642.52231Second Prize
24University of Zagreb559203.453.34612·2Second Prize
25Belarusian State University 2366202.750.7582··1HM
26Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)664193.852.7272··2HM
27Tel Aviv University350193.348.349·3··Second Prize
28Technical University of Munich472192.55140.5111·Third Prize
29Central University467186.54838.51·21Third Prize
30University of Utrecht359182.745.74511·1HM
31KU Leuven and Ghent University464182.54738.51·21Third Prize
32National Higher School of Mathematics572178.247.3351·21Third Prize
33Plekhanov Russian University of Economics4571784640.51111Third Prize
34National and Kapodistrian University of Athens351177.344.344·21·Third Prize
35Loránd Eötvös University651165.342.737·141Third Prize
36Peoples' Friendship University of Russia565164.244281·11HM
37Technion451160.84237.5·2·1HM
38ITA - Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica64815941.733·122Third Prize
39Bar Ilan University445158.841.740·21·Third Prize
40South African Mathematics Foundation Team44014837.336··22HM
41National Technical University of Athens347145.336.340·111HM
41Aalto University339145.336.336··3·Third Prize
43Nanyang Technological University449144.338.333·2·1HM
44NES & HSE University63914036.732··32Third Prize
45Constructor University54413837.332·111HM
46University of Amsterdam737133.936.329··31Third Prize
47University of Bristol452132.33425·1·2HM
48Instituto Militar de Engenharia54313134.326·112HM
49University College London345125.331.335·11·
50Università degli Studi di Udine847123.13418·1·2HM
51TU Chemnitz458122.331.718.51··1
52Ben Gurion University of the Negev439117.330.326··11
53Urgench State University3351162930··12HM
54University of Patras349109.327.321·1·1
55Aristotle University of Thessaloniki632107.22921···3HM
56University of Tübingen248106.535.5·1·1
57Kazakh-British Technical University32997.324.323···3HM
58Université de Toulouse334882223··11
59Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń2468729·1··
60ENSIA (National Higher School of Artificial Intelligence)22773.524.5···2
61University of Cyprus, Team A334721811··1·
62Trinity College Dublin41970.51817.5····
63University of Groningen1306030···1
64University of Cyprus, Team B42257.815.312···1
65Universidad de Sevilla32257.314.311···1
66CUNEF Universidad1102010····

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
447 contestants · 66 teams (66 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 57 · Second ≥ 43 · Third ≥ 34 · Honourable Mention ≥ 20

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).